It is now December 2009 and a full year has passed since the bailouts of both General Motors and Chrysler took place. Looking back at the events that have taken place over the last year, I question the success of these bailouts? Where they necessary? Where they a wise taxpayer funded investment? Without viewing any specific financial information belonging to General Motors or Chrysler, I would suspect, along with many other individuals, that the typical response to all three of these questions would begin with a resounding no. The main objective of the bailout was to prevent both corporations from entering bankruptcy. As we know today, the bailout did not prevent this objective. Both car companies still entered bankruptcy after receiving taxpayer funds not once, but twice. Chrysler filed in April with General Motors following suit in June.
I remember the corporate executives of both companies testifying in front of Congress pleading for bailout funds. Congress refused to support their request. At the time of this request, President Bush was still in office. He and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson religiously stated that this bailout was absolutely necessary for both the citizens of the United States and the corporations. Since Congress would not comply, Bush and Paulson decided to give both car companies funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, otherwise known as TARP. These funds originally were designated to only purchase “troubled assets” from financial institutions (i.e. banks) in light of the mortgage crisis. Continue reading ‘A Reflection of the Auto Bailouts’ »